There are moments in a nation’s journey when resilience becomes more than just a word, it becomes a way of life. For Pakistan, living under the shadow of militancy and external meddling has tested its patience, unity, and endurance for over two decades. Yet time and again, the country has shown that no matter how persistent the threat, its will to fight back remains stronger. The recent operations in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where nineteen militants of “Fitna al-Khawarij” were neutralized, are part of that very story: a story not only of survival but of determined resistance.
When numbers tell a story, it is hard to ignore. In 2024, Pakistan endured 521 terrorist attacks, with 852 lives lost. Over 1,000 people were injured. These are not just figures, they are alarm bells, signs of a mounting threat. And now, in early September 2025, the neutralization of nineteen Khawarij belonging to “Fitna al-Khawarij” in three separate intelligence-based operations in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa offers a fresh chapter in Pakistan’s response, a chapter built on action, strategy, and resolve.
In the districts of Mohmand, North Waziristan (Datta Khel), and Bannu, between September 9 and 10, security forces carried out operations that resulted in the deaths of nineteen militants identified as part of an “Indian proxy.” These operations align with a pattern documented last year, where more than 95% of all terrorist attacks were concentrated in two provinces: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan. KP alone recorded 295 attacks in 2024, making it the most afflicted province.
The scale of operations also reflects Pakistan’s resolve. According to ISPR, security forces conducted 59,775 intelligence-based operations (IBOs) across the country in 2024 and eliminated 925 terrorists during them. These operations, averaging over 160 daily, show persistence and reach. It is not just about reacting; it is about maintaining pressure.
In 2024, Pakistan witnessed 521 terrorist attacks, which led to 852 deaths, a 23% rise in fatalities compared to 2023. Security forces suffered deeply: 358 members of security and law enforcement were martyred, including personnel from the Frontier Corps, police, army, Levies, and paramilitary units. Civilians also paid a steep price, with 355 killed and 621 injured. Think-tank reports mark 2024 as the deadliest year for security forces in nearly a decade, with at least 685 security personnel killed and 444 terror attacks recorded. Altogether, combined fatalities among civilians and security forces reached approximately 1,600.
What makes the recent operations noteworthy is not just that they were successful, but how they were conducted. Intelligence-based, targeted engagements distinguish them from past waves of broad operations with heavy collateral impact. In Mohmand, North Waziristan, and Bannu, for example, these strikes were precise: commanders claim actual militants were eliminated based on concrete intelligence. These aren’t vague promises; they are operational results that reinforce public trust in the security forces.
Another dimension is the consistent public attribution of sponsor links. Terms such as “Indian proxy” and “Fitna al-Khawarij” are regularly used by ISPR when referring to the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and associated groups. While the full evidence (financial trails, intercepted communications, captured materials) is generally not released in detail for security reasons, the state has made repeated claims tied to recovered weapons, confessions, and intelligence analysis. These attributions serve both internal messaging (to maintain morale and public support) and external posture (to assert Pakistan’s view of cross-border interference).
Yet, even with all this, the problem remains steep. A sharp increase in militant attacks since 2021, especially following the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan, shows that sanctuary across the border continues to enable militant regrouping. And while Balochistan’s separatist groups, like the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) are also responsible for a rising number of attacks, especially in 2024, the primary burden remains in KP, where militants exploit terrain, porous borders, and local vulnerabilities.
What must be done to eliminate this threat? First, Pakistan must keep sharpening its intelligence networks improving HUMINT, tech surveillance, and financial-investigation capabilities. Operations must continue to be precise, minimizing civilian harm. Second, border management must be strengthened: monitoring cross-border movement, enhancing cooperation with Afghan authorities, and ensuring that no safe haven exists unchecked. Third, domestic policies need to address root causes: economic development, education, governance in border tribes, rule of law, so that militant narratives find fewer recruits.
Internationally, Pakistan should press the case for multilateral support. Forums like the UN, FATF, and global counter-terrorism alliances should be reminded that proxy warfare carries consequences. Transparent documentation of sponsor links, including those claimed by ISPR, can build international pressure. Countries financing or facilitating militant activity must be held accountable, or face diplomatic, economic, and reputational costs.
The story is not over with nineteen militants killed. But in those nineteen, there is meaning: firmness, capability, refusal to cede ground. Pakistan’s commitment shows in each operation, each life sacrificed, each effort to expose the networks behind the violence. For Pakistani citizens, each statistic is personal; each martyr is remembered. For adversaries, each success is notice that Pakistan does not relent.
These are numbers, yes but they are also resolve. As long as Pakistan combines strategy with sacrifice, intelligence with action, it moves beyond surviving. It builds strength. And that strength rooted in the sacrifices of those lost, and the courage of those who continue, becomes the truest form of national security.
Author
