The recent publication of an article under the name of Imran Khan in an international magazine has raised significant concerns about the credibility and authenticity of the entire episode. Given that Imran Khan is currently incarcerated with no access to digital platforms or physical correspondence, it is imperative to question who is writing on his behalf. The claim that he is personally drafting such articles is not only absurd but also exposes a well-orchestrated propaganda campaign being run by foreign elements. This is not just about political rhetoric; it is about a deep-rooted attempt to manipulate public perception using his name as a tool for vested interests.
A fundamental question arises: how can a convicted individual, confined within a high-security prison, be operating a Twitter account and engaging with global audiences? It is widely known that jail regulations do not permit inmates to use mobile phones or social media platforms. If these restrictions are being enforced for all prisoners, why is an exception being made for Imran Khan? The answer lies in the fact that he is not the one managing these activities at all. Instead, it is his foreign backers, including the Goldsmith family and their extensive network, who are running these accounts and crafting carefully curated messages to sustain his image on the global stage. His social media presence is not an organic expression of a political leader but a manufactured spectacle designed to create a misleading narrative.
Beyond social media, another critical issue is the alleged authorship of articles attributed to Imran Khan. Writing from prison, especially without access to paper, internet, or any means of communication with the outside world, is practically impossible. The jail staff has categorically denied any knowledge of him writing or sending out manuscripts. This raises a serious concern: who is actually writing these articles in his name? The pattern indicates a sophisticated PR campaign where a dedicated team of ghostwriters, most likely based in Western capitals, is producing content to sustain the illusion of his political relevance. The objective is not to promote democracy or human rights, as they falsely claim, but to serve the interests of those who stand to benefit from continued instability in Pakistan.
This entire scheme reveals a more sinister truth: Imran Khan is no longer a political figure but a commercial product. His name, image, and manufactured victimhood are being exploited to generate funds and influence for a select few. The foreign stakeholders who have historically funded his ventures are now cashing in on his situation, ensuring that his propaganda continues to be disseminated even while he is behind bars. This is not an individual-led struggle for democracy; it is a meticulously planned project where every tweet, article, and statement is strategically placed to manipulate international opinion. The financial machinery behind this campaign indicates that Imran Khan’s political existence is being artificially prolonged not for his benefit but for the economic and ideological gains of his foreign handlers.
The involvement of Western lobbying firms and PR agencies in this effort further reinforces the argument that this is not a genuine democratic struggle but an expensive international project. The strategic placement of articles in globally recognized publications and the simultaneous social media trends in his favor suggest the presence of a well-funded operation. If Imran Khan were truly the author of these pieces, the world must demand transparency: how are these writings being transmitted from a maximum-security prison? Who is facilitating their publication? And why are international platforms so eager to provide space to a convicted individual without verifying the authenticity of the authorship?
It is now crucial to expose this fabricated movement for what it truly is. The public must understand that Imran Khan is merely a brand being utilized to push a specific agenda. His so-called global campaign is neither organic nor spontaneous, it is an orchestrated attempt to mislead the masses and divert attention from the realities on the ground. Instead of focusing on the needs of the Pakistani people, his backers are investing in a media war that benefits only a select few. The nation cannot afford to be deceived by this narrative any longer. The people of Pakistan deserve transparency and honesty, not a carefully scripted drama designed to serve the interests of external forces. The truth must prevail, and this global deception must be dismantled before it causes irreversible damage to the country’s stability and democratic processes.
