Once again, the world finds itself watching the unfolding tensions between the United States and Iran, this time with renewed urgency. Tehran has issued a sharp warning: if the threats from outside powers continue, it may take serious steps, including removing the UN nuclear watchdog inspectors from its soil. This warning comes just as Iranian and American officials prepare to meet in Oman for high-level discussions aimed at reducing tensions and avoiding conflict.

This is not just a routine diplomatic hiccup-it’s a serious moment. The Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei has emphasized that Iran is engaging in these talks in “good faith,” choosing diplomacy over hostility, even when others continue with what Tehran sees as aggressive rhetoric. “America should appreciate this decision,” Baqaei said, highlighting that Iran is trying to open a door rather than slam it shut.

But the situation remains fragile. US President Donald Trump, speaking just days before the talks, warned that military action against Iran was “absolutely” possible if negotiations failed. Even more alarming was his statement that Israel would be involved and possibly lead any military move. For Iran, such comments are not taken lightly, especially given its long-standing position that it is not seeking nuclear weapons.

This threat of war brings back memories of the past. In 2015, Iran had signed a historic nuclear deal with world powers. Under that agreement, Iran reduced its nuclear activity and opened its facilities to inspection in exchange for relief from international sanctions. It was seen as a rare win for diplomacy. But in 2018, the situation changed dramatically when the US, under Trump, withdrew from the deal and reimposed tough sanctions. Iran, feeling betrayed, began to walk back its own commitments under the deal, restarting and speeding up its nuclear program.

Now, Iran finds itself under more pressure. The US has just imposed new sanctions targeting Iran’s nuclear and oil sectors. And in a clear show of force, it has sent B-2 bombers to a military base on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia. These moves come amid a broader military campaign in Yemen, raising concerns that the stage is being set for more confrontation in the Middle East.

In response to the threats, a top adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Rear Admiral Ali Shamkhani, issued a strong message. He said that if the threats continue and Iran feels under military attack, it could consider expelling the inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and might even transfer enriched nuclear material to secure locations. This would be a serious step and would almost certainly raise alarm across the international community.

In Washington, the reaction was swift. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said that such actions would be a clear sign that Iran is not serious about keeping its nuclear program peaceful. “Expelling IAEA inspectors would be a miscalculation,” she warned. Her statement reflects how closely the US is watching Iran’s next move-and how quickly things could escalate if diplomacy fails.

It is important to understand what is at stake. The IAEA plays a critical role in monitoring nuclear activities. If Iran removes these inspectors, it would not only increase suspicion but also reduce transparency, making it harder for the world to know what’s really happening in Iran’s nuclear facilities. And once trust is broken in international diplomacy, it takes years-if not decades-to rebuild.

This is why the upcoming talks in Oman matter. While Iran has said it is not ready for direct negotiations with the US, it is still open to indirect discussions. It’s a cautious step, but a necessary one. At the same time, the US appears divided on its own approach. Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed hope, saying, “We’re hopeful this will lead to peace.” That optimism, however, is undercut by other officials who continue to push for hardline measures.

The truth is, both sides are under pressure. Iran’s economy is under strain from sanctions, and its leaders know that escalation could lead to war. On the other hand, the US, with elections and political divisions at home, must balance strength with strategy. Military action may win headlines, but it rarely brings lasting peace-especially in a region as complex and volatile as the Middle East.

The international community is watching closely. If diplomacy works, it could pave the way for renewed dialogue and perhaps even a revival of the nuclear deal in some form. If it fails, the world may once again face rising oil prices, regional instability, and the risk of a broader conflict.

For now, Iran is signaling both caution and readiness. It says it prefers peace but won’t stay silent under threats. The US, meanwhile, is testing whether Iran is truly open to talks or just buying time. Both sides are walking a thin line.