The arrest and 20-year sentencing of Indian agent Usman at Pakistan’s Chaman border is not just another spy story, it is a smoking gun. His capture exposes New Delhi’s covert war to destabilize Balochistan through terror and espionage. For years, Pakistan has warned that India fuels militancy and separatism to block peace and development in the province. Usman’s conviction now adds hard evidence to those warnings, proving this is no isolated case but part of a dangerous pattern, from Kulbhushan Jadhav to a growing list of operatives, showing how India exports sabotage across Pakistan’s borders.
Usman’s dual identity, carrying both Indian and Afghan documentation reveals how deeply intertwined India’s intelligence operations are with regional nexuses. This is not a coincidence. For years, Afghan soil has been exploited as a launching pad for anti-Pakistan activities, with India establishing multiple consulates along the border regions far beyond the needs of diplomacy. A 2020 dossier released by Pakistan’s Foreign Office provided detailed proof of Indian consulates in Kandahar and Jalalabad serving as hubs for terror financing and logistics. Usman’s case, therefore, is not an exception, it is part of this broader blueprint.
The timing and location of this arrest are also crucial. Balochistan, despite being Pakistan’s largest province by area, is also its most resource-rich, holding nearly 40% of the country’s natural gas reserves and serving as the backbone of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Projects such as Gwadar Port and road networks promise to transform not only Pakistan’s economy but the trade routes of the wider region. For India, this is unacceptable. By sponsoring separatists and militants, New Delhi hopes to turn Balochistan into a bleeding wound for Pakistan, preventing development projects from reaching their potential.
Evidence of India’s role in fueling unrest in Balochistan is overwhelming. The most notorious case remains that of Kulbhushan Jadhav, a serving commander in the Indian Navy, arrested in 2016 from Balochistan. Jadhav confessed to orchestrating terror attacks, funding insurgent groups, and spreading chaos in Karachi and Balochistan under direct orders of India’s intelligence agency, RAW. His arrest was not Pakistan’s claim alone, it was validated through international proceedings, including hearings at the International Court of Justice. Usman’s case adds another clear piece to this jigsaw puzzle, demonstrating that India’s strategy has not changed; it has only grown more sophisticated.
Pakistan has not been silent about these threats. In 2020, Islamabad released a comprehensive 131-page dossier containing irrefutable evidence of India’s involvement in terrorism. The document detailed over Rs. 22 billion in funding traced to RAW, funneled into militant networks operating in Balochistan and tribal districts. Specific accounts, receipts, and transfers were shared, exposing how India pays insurgent leaders to attack security forces, sabotage infrastructure, and spread fear among locals. In just one example, a Baloch terrorist commander was provided $820,000 by Indian handlers to recruit fighters and purchase weapons.
The consequences of this hybrid warfare are visible on the ground. Between 2015 and 2021, Pakistan’s National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA) reported that over 3,000 lives were lost in Balochistan due to terror attacks and insurgent violence. Many of these attacks, on schools, markets, and security personnel were linked to groups funded and armed by India. These are not abstract numbers; they represent shattered families, orphaned children, and communities held hostage to violence.
Yet, in the face of these challenges, Pakistan’s response has been measured and lawful. Usman’s conviction illustrates this clearly. Instead of engaging in tit-for-tat accusations, Pakistan built its case, presented hard evidence, and allowed the courts to deliver a just verdict. This stands in stark contrast to India’s behaviour, where baseless allegations are frequently hurled at Pakistan without proof, often as a diversion from its own failures in Kashmir or its domestic unrest.
The global community must ask itself a serious question: how long can these patterns be ignored? Terrorism is condemned in Europe, America, and Africa, yet when India sponsors terrorism in Balochistan, it is too often brushed aside as part of a bilateral rivalry. This selective blindness emboldens New Delhi to continue its covert operations. International silence is not neutrality; it is complicity.
India’s actions are not only an attack on Pakistan, they are a threat to regional peace. Balochistan lies at the crossroads of South and Central Asia. If it is destabilized, projects like CPEC will falter, depriving the region of much-needed economic connectivity. Already, foreign investors have voiced concerns about security in the province, precisely the outcome India seeks. By exporting chaos, New Delhi undermines not just Pakistan’s stability but also the economic future of an entire region.
Usman’s sentencing is therefore both a warning and a wake-up call. For India, it is proof that Pakistan’s vigilance will continue to expose its proxies. For the world, it is yet another reminder that the evidence of Indian-sponsored terrorism in Balochistan is no longer deniable. From Kulbhushan Jadhav to the billions funnelled into insurgent outfits, the chain of proof is long, detailed, and damning.
Pakistan has played its part, capturing operatives, presenting dossiers, and following the rule of law. Now the responsibility lies with the international community. Will it continue to turn a blind eye, or will it hold India accountable for sponsoring terror in one of the world’s most sensitive regions? The choice is clear, but the consequences of silence will be even clearer: more bloodshed, more instability, and a region pushed further away from peace.
Author
