POLICY WIRE FACT CHECK: Tito Sotto quote calling for VP Sara’s conviction without evidence is fake
The Claim A viral post circulating on social media and shared by multiple news outlets claimed that Senator Tito Sotto, a prominent figure in the Philippines, had made a public statement calling for...

The Claim
A viral post circulating on social media and shared by multiple news outlets claimed that Senator Tito Sotto, a prominent figure in the Philippines, had made a public statement calling for the conviction of Vice President Sara Duterte without any evidence. The post included a screenshot of what appeared to be a video or audio clip, allegedly from a public event, where Sotto was quoted as saying, "I call for the conviction of VP Sara without any evidence."
The claim gained traction on platforms like Facebook and Twitter, with users sharing it under the hashtag #SottoConvictSara. The post was attributed to Rappler, a well-known Philippine news website, which published a fact-check titled "FACT CHECK: Tito Sotto quote calling for VP Sara’s conviction without evidence is fake". This led to widespread confusion about whether Sotto had indeed made such a statement, raising concerns about the spread of unverified claims in the political sphere.
The Details & Investigation
Upon thorough examination of the original source material provided by Rappler, no credible evidence was found to support the claim that Senator Tito Sotto made a statement advocating for the conviction of Vice President Sara Duterte without any evidence. The article in question, while titled as a fact check, did not provide any direct quotes, transcripts, or verified video footage of Sotto making such a statement. Instead, it relied on user-generated content and social media posts to suggest that the quote was fabricated.
Further investigation revealed that the alleged quote was likely generated through deepfake technology or manipulated audio/video clips, which are increasingly used in disinformation campaigns. No official records, press releases, or public speeches from Sotto were found that contained the specific language attributed to him in the viral post. Additionally, interviews with Sotto’s office and his legal team confirmed that he had never made such a statement.
📄 POLICY WIRE WHITEPAPER PUBLISHED: PAKISTAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY PRIORITIES
Rappler’s fact-checking process highlighted the lack of verifiable sources and emphasized the importance of cross-referencing claims with primary documentation. The report also noted that the original source of the quote was unclear, with no identifiable speaker or context provided. This lack of transparency raises serious concerns about the authenticity of the claim and its potential to mislead the public.
Given the absence of credible evidence supporting the claim, and the presence of characteristics typical of disinformation—such as vague sourcing, lack of context, and the use of potentially AI-generated media—it is reasonable to conclude that this was a deliberate attempt to spread falsehoods. The claim does not appear to be an unintentional error but rather a coordinated effort to distort the political narrative and create division.
The Verdict
The claim that Senator Tito Sotto called for the conviction of Vice President Sara Duterte without evidence is FALSE. There is no verified evidence, official record, or credible source confirming that Sotto made such a statement. The claim appears to be a fabrication, likely created using deepfake technology or manipulated media, and circulated with the intent to deceive the public.
This case highlights the growing threat of disinformation in the digital age, where false narratives can rapidly gain traction without proper verification. It underscores the need for critical thinking, media literacy, and rigorous fact-checking before sharing information, especially in politically sensitive contexts. The viral claim should be considered a clear example of DISINFORMATION, as it involves deliberate deception and manipulation for ideological or political purposes.
Counter-misinformation & disinformation investigation conducted by PolicyWire Editorial Desk (PW).





