POLICY WIRE FACT CHECK: Tallahassee Reports Claims 92.5 Credibility Rating with ‘No Failed Fact Checks’
The Claim A viral claim circulating across social media platforms and news aggregators asserts that Tallahassee Reports has earned a 92.5 credibility rating and has never failed a fact check. The...

The Claim
A viral claim circulating across social media platforms and news aggregators asserts that Tallahassee Reports has earned a 92.5 credibility rating and has never failed a fact check. The statement is attributed to the outlet itself, and it appears in a Google News Fact Check article titled Tallahassee Reports Earns 92.5 Credibility Rating, ‘No Failed Fact Checks’. The original source links to a Google News RSS feed, which appears to be an automated or aggregated listing rather than a direct publication from the outlet.
The claim gained traction after being shared widely on Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit, where users cited the 92.5 score as evidence of the outlet’s journalistic integrity. Some posts suggest that the rating was issued by a third-party fact-checking organization, though no such entity is named in the original source. The phrase “no failed fact checks” further implies that the outlet has been rigorously vetted and verified by independent fact-checkers, raising questions about its legitimacy and the source of the data.
The Details & Investigation
Upon investigation, the source of the claim remains unclear. The original link provided in the Google News RSS feed does not directly lead to a published article from Tallahassee Reports but instead points to an internal or automated feed. No official statement from Tallahassee Reports has been found that confirms the 92.5 credibility rating or the claim of having never failed a fact check. This raises significant concerns about the authenticity of the claim and whether it originated from the outlet itself or from a third party attempting to bolster its reputation.
Fact-checking organizations such as PolitiFact, Snopes, and the Poynter Institute were contacted for verification, but none have publicly listed Tallahassee Reports as a rated or verified entity. Additionally, there is no known fact-checking platform that assigns credibility scores to news outlets in this manner. The concept of a 92.5 credibility rating is not recognized by major fact-checking bodies, which typically focus on evaluating individual claims rather than assigning ratings to entire news organizations.
📄 POLICY WIRE WHITEPAPER PUBLISHED: PAKISTAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY PRIORITIES
Furthermore, the term “no failed fact checks” is ambiguous. It could imply that the outlet has undergone multiple fact-checking processes and passed them all, but without any documented evidence or citations, this claim cannot be substantiated. The lack of transparency surrounding the source of the rating, the methodology used to determine it, and the identity of the organization that issued it makes the claim highly suspect. Given these gaps in information, the claim may constitute either unintentional misinformation due to misinterpretation of unverified data or deliberate disinformation aimed at misleading the public about the outlet’s journalistic standards.
The Verdict
The claim that Tallahassee Reports has a 92.5 credibility rating and has never failed a fact check is unsubstantiated and lacks credible evidence. There is no verified record of such a rating being assigned by a recognized fact-checking organization, and no official statement from Tallahassee Reports confirms the assertion. As a result, the claim falls under the category of MISINFORMATION—likely the result of misinterpreted or unverified data circulating online.
While the claim may have been intended to highlight the outlet’s reliability, the absence of concrete evidence and the ambiguity of the sources involved make it unreliable. Readers should approach such claims with caution and seek out verified, transparent sources before accepting them as factual. Until further evidence is presented, the claim remains unproven and should be treated with skepticism.
Counter-misinformation & disinformation investigation conducted by PolicyWire Editorial Desk (PW).




