On September 2, 2025, at the FC Line in Bannu, a routine day turned into a battlefield when terrorists launched a sudden assault. Six personnel were martyred instantly, and elite SSG Commando Major Adnan Aslam was martyred later, in a fierce exchange of fire that also killed five terrorists. During the operation, Major Adnan was struck by bullets in his hand and leg while providing cover for a wounded soldier, managing to eliminate two terrorists before he went down himself. He and the soldier he shielded, Sepoy Muhammad Asim, ended up protecting each other in that exchange, each absorbing fire meant for the other, a moment of comradeship rarely seen even in the records of war. Major Adnan was rushed to CMH Rawalpindi, where he fought for his life for several days before succumbing to his wounds.
His story spread quickly across Pakistan, shared, mourned, and honoured by ordinary citizens and senior officers alike. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir both attended his funeral, a gesture that said plainly: this country does not forget the men who bleed for it. It’s the kind of story that briefly moves an entire nation and then quietly fades from the news cycle, one name among many, one family left to carry a grief the rest of the country only glimpsed for a week.
Yet, when few media outlets and commentators write about this same war, the story is almost always framed differently. Every few months, some commentary revives allegations questioning Pakistan’s counterterrorism campaign. Such narratives often overlook the sacrifices of security personnel and ignore the broader operational context. These accounts often present a partial picture of Pakistan’s counterterrorism campaign, overlooking the sacrifices of security personnel, and they leave out the bigger picture, including men like Major Adnan, who took bullets meant for another man and then held on for days rather than let go. The truth is simpler and more honest: Pakistan’s security forces continue to confront one of the world’s most persistent terrorist threats.
The Numbers Tell Their Own Story
The scale of what Pakistan’s security forces are dealing with is not in serious dispute, it is tracked in detail by independent monitors. According to the Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies (PICSS), an Islamabad-based think tank that publishes monthly security assessments, the first six months of 2026 alone saw 2,166 conflict-related fatalities nationwide: 1,442 militants, 404 civilians, 307 security forces personnel, and 13 members of government peace committees. Another 1,137 people were injured in the same period. These are not vague estimates, they are broken down month by month, province by province, and cross-checked against ISPR statements and independent journalism.
The trend within that period tells its own story. PICSS recorded a sharp improvement in the first four months of 2026, attacks fell 42 percent from March to April alone, and security forces casualties dropped by more than half in the same window, even as security forces killed 988 militants over those four months. May then saw a violent reversal, with civilian deaths up 92 percent and security-personnel casualties up 143 percent month-on-month, driven by a wave of suicide bombings concentrated in Balochistan. By June, the numbers eased again, with fatalities among security forces falling 62 percent from May’s spike, even as high-profile attacks, including a suicide bombing on a Rangers compound in Karachi that killed three personnel, continued to test the force.
This volatility, not a straight line of victory or defeat, is the honest picture: terrorism that adapts month to month, and a security apparatus that keeps absorbing losses, keeps adjusting, and keeps returning to the field. It is also worth noting that Pakistan topped the Global Terrorism Index for 2026, recording 1,139 terrorism-related deaths in 2025 alone, the highest such toll the country has recorded in over a decade, and a burden few other nations are currently carrying at this scale. Balochistan alone saw at least 254 recorded terrorist attacks in 2025, a 26 percent rise on the year before, while the province’s own chief minister has said more than 700 terrorists were killed there by security forces in that year.
None of this is a story a state can hide, even if it wanted to. It is published monthly, cross-referenced by multiple outlets, and cited by critics and defenders alike, which is precisely why the “cover-up” narrative sits uneasily next to the sheer volume of verifiable, granular data in the public domain.
One Nation, One Line of Defence
What rarely makes it into the critical coverage is how consistently Pakistan’s civil and military leadership show up together, in public, at the worst moments. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir have repeatedly appeared side by side at funerals of martyred soldiers and officers, the same two men, again and again, standing with grieving families. That pattern held after Major Adnan Aslam’s death in Bannu, after the July 2026 Mangi Dam attack in Ziarat, and after countless smaller operations that never make international headlines at all. Political parties that disagree on almost everything else have, for decades, backed the armed forces’ counter-terrorism operations, a rare point of unity in a country not otherwise known for consensus.
That unity shows up operationally, not just at funerals. In one recent Bannu attack, security forces stopped a suicide bomber before he could reach a security convoy and civilian bystanders, averting what the army described as a major catastrophe, even as two of the soldiers involved were martyred in the process. The same pattern repeated in Ziarat: when militants attacked the police post guarding the Mangi Dam water supply for Quetta, the nine officers who died were protecting a facility that keeps water running for millions of ordinary civilians, not a military asset. When security forces struck back afterward, killing more than 75 militants within days. It was another case shown, publicly and repeatedly, as restoring the safety of the civilians those policemen had martyred defending.
This is the through line critics tend to skip: Pakistan’s soldiers and police are not fighting terrorism in the abstract. Outpost by outpost, they are standing between militant groups and the ordinary people, water workers, commuters, schoolchildren, villagers, who would otherwise be the target. The country’s institutions continue to work together.
The Bigger Picture
It is easy for outside commentators, particularly from rival countries, to twist the narrative in their own favour but the facts on the ground, and the numbers behind them, tell a different story: a nation and its security forces absorbing enormous, well-documented losses while refusing to back down, a military leadership that visits grieving families, and a security apparatus that hits back hard against those responsible. Pakistan’s soldiers and police are not abandoned. They remain on the front line protecting ordinary Pakistanis from forces that want to see the country torn apart. That is the story the data supports, and the one that deserves to be told.
Author
