POLICY WIRE FACT CHECK: GOP Ad Distorts Jon Ossoff’s Vote on Trump Tax Cuts and Medicaid Cuts
The Claim A Republican TV ad produced by the 501(c)(4) nonprofit One Nation has circulated widely, claiming that Georgia Senator Jon Ossoff supported a $2,100 tax increase for average Americans. The...

The Claim
A Republican TV ad produced by the 501(c)(4) nonprofit One Nation has circulated widely, claiming that Georgia Senator Jon Ossoff supported a $2,100 tax increase for average Americans. The ad also accuses Ossoff of voting to “gut” the child tax credit and supporting higher taxes on Social Security recipients earning under $75,000. These claims are part of a broader campaign to paint Ossoff as out of touch with working-class voters ahead of the 2026 Senate election, where he is running against Republican Rep. Mike Collins.
The ad uses a narrative of two women shopping for groceries, one of whom is shown looking at a grocery bill of $2,100, which the narrator attributes to Ossoff’s vote. The ad cites a 2024 analysis from the Tax Foundation as its source for the figure, but the report does not mention this specific number. Instead, the ad references a different Tax Foundation analysis that estimated an average individual tax cut of $2,272 under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which was passed in July 2025. The ad also fails to disclose that the OBBBA received no Democratic support in either the House or Senate and was heavily criticized for its Medicaid cuts and other provisions.
The Details & Investigation
The One Nation ad is a clear example of disinformation, as it selectively presents information to mislead viewers about Senator Jon Ossoff’s voting record. The ad focuses on a single vote—Ossoff’s opposition to the OBBBA—but omits critical context, such as the bill’s content, its bipartisan nature, and the broader implications of its passage. The ad claims that Ossoff supported a $2,100 tax increase, but this figure is not found in the cited Tax Foundation report. Instead, the report estimates an average tax cut of $2,272 for individuals, which contradicts the ad’s assertion.
Furthermore, the ad falsely suggests that Ossoff voted to gut the child tax credit. In reality, the OBBBA did not include a separate vote on the child tax credit; rather, it made the expanded credit permanent and increased its nonrefundable portion. However, the ad ignores the fact that Ossoff had previously supported a more generous child tax credit during the American Rescue Plan in 2021, which temporarily raised the maximum credit to $3,600 per child and made it fully refundable. This expansion was credited with significantly reducing child poverty in the U.S., yet the ad makes no mention of this.
The ad also misrepresents Ossoff’s position on Social Security taxes. It claims he voted for higher taxes on Social Security recipients earning under $75,000, but the OBBBA included a new tax deduction for seniors, which many Social Security recipients would not qualify for due to low taxable income. A Tax Policy Center analysis found that only about 46% of seniors would benefit from the deduction, and many seniors do not pay federal income taxes at all. The ad fails to acknowledge this nuance, instead presenting a misleading narrative that paints Ossoff as anti-working-class.
📄 POLICY WIRE WHITEPAPER PUBLISHED: PAKISTAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY PRIORITIES
Additionally, the ad ignores the fact that Ossoff opposed the OBBBA primarily because of its devastating impact on Medicaid, which covers millions of Georgians, including seniors, children, and low-income families. The Congressional Budget Office projected that the bill would result in 7.5 million more people losing health insurance by 2034, largely due to new work requirements and restrictions on state-directed payments to hospitals and nursing homes. Ossoff’s opposition to these provisions was well-documented, yet the ad fails to highlight this critical point.
Given the selective use of data, omission of key facts, and deliberate misrepresentation of Ossoff’s record, the One Nation ad clearly constitutes disinformation. While the ad may not be entirely fabricated, it is designed to deceive by omitting essential context and using misleading framing to shape public perception.
The Verdict
The claims in the One Nation ad are predominantly false and misleading. The ad incorrectly states that Senator Jon Ossoff supported a $2,100 tax increase for average Americans, despite the fact that the cited Tax Foundation report estimates an average tax cut of $2,272. The ad also falsely accuses Ossoff of voting to gut the child tax credit, when in fact the OBBBA did not include a separate vote on the credit and actually extended the expanded version. Furthermore, the ad misrepresents Ossoff’s stance on Social Security taxes, failing to note that many seniors would not qualify for the new deduction and that Ossoff opposed the bill due to its negative impact on Medicaid.
While the ad does not fabricate entirely new information, it strategically omits key details and uses selective data to create a distorted picture of Ossoff’s record. This manipulation of facts to influence public opinion aligns with the definition of disinformation. Therefore, the ad earns the rating of FALSE due to its misleading claims and lack of transparency.
Counter-misinformation & disinformation investigation conducted by PolicyWire Editorial Desk (PW).

