Recent allegations by Indian Army on Pakistan Army’s Special Service Group (SSG) for conducting a surgical strike in Kamkari, a location deep inside Indian Army’s operational area, raise significant doubts about the credibility of such assertions. The difficult terrain and persistent security challenges along the Line of Control (LoC) suggest that such claims might be exaggerated, reflecting a broader pattern of blame and mis-information. A critical examination of operational effectiveness, intelligence, resource allocation, and strategic priorities therefore remains essential for addressing the underlying security issues in IIOJ&K.
Recent statements from the Indian Army about their operations in Kashmir, especially regarding alleged surgical strikes against cross-border terrorism, have sparked considerable debate. A noteworthy claim involves the alleged incursion by Pakistan’s Special Service Group (SSG) into Kamkari, a location 20 kilometers away from the Line of Control (LoC) and within the 15 Corps’ area of responsibility (AOR). This claim merits a thorough examination, as it raises significant questions about the Indian Army’s ability to secure the LoC and manage security within its operational boundaries.
Kamkari, situated 20 kilometers from the LoC and 6 kilometers southwest of Machil village in Kupwara, falls within the 15 Corps’ AOR. To substantiate a surgical strike, both strategic soundness and accurate operational management are necessary. The assertion that Pakistan’s SSG carried out such an operation deep within the 15 Corps’ AOR suggests an extension of operations well beyond the immediate defensive perimeter along the LoC. If SSG commandos were able to infiltrate that deep inside Indian territory for conducting an operation, they truly deserve applauds, concurrently it serves as a moment of serious introspection for Indian Army Northern Command.
The challenges associated with Kamkari are considerable. The terrain is notoriously difficult, characterized by dense forests, rugged hills, and unpredictable weather, complicating military operations. Effective management of such terrain requires precise intelligence, coordination, and operational agility. Furthermore, the Indian Army’s capacity to secure the LoC and handle internal operations within its AOR remains vital for assessing the credibility of such claims.
Strategic Implications of Surgical Strike Narrative
The term “surgical strike” refers to a highly targeted military operation, designed to inflict damage on specific objectives, while minimizing the collateral damage. The Indian Army’s frequent use of this term, along with dramatic claims, is intended to project an image of proactive and decisive action against perceived threats. However, the effectiveness and authenticity of these strikes are often questioned, due to a lack of independent verification and transparency. The recent allegations of a surgical strike by Pakistan’s SSG in Kamkari prompt further scrutiny. If such strikes are being claimed, it raises following points:-
1.Operational Effectiveness: What factors contribute to the difficulty for Indian Army in establishing and sustaining effective control over the LoC?
2.Intelligence and Preparedness: The success of any surgical strike depends heavily on accurate intelligence and operational preparedness. How effective is the Indian Army’s intelligence network in pre-emptively identifying and addressing potential threats before those reach the LoC?
3.Resource Allocation: The recent deployment of additional BSF troops and the focus on high-profile operations raise concerns about resource allocation and prioritization. Are resources being optimally utilized to address the most pressing security challenges, or is there a tendency to focus on high-visibility operations that might not address underlying issues?
4.Strategic Priorities: The emphasis on surgical strikes and so-called terror incidents might overshadow broader strategic and operational priorities. How does focusing on these operations impact the overall strategy for maintaining security and stability in Kashmir and along the LoC?
The Pattern of Blame and Reality Check
The tendency of the Indian Army to blame Pakistan for surgical strikes on Indian territory, often without concrete evidence, raises questions about the authenticity of these claims. The narrative of Pakistani surgical strikes, particularly in challenging terrains like Kamkari, may be indicative of a broader pattern of accusations that lack substantiation. The reality often appears to be more complex than the dramatic claims suggest, pointing towards a potential pattern of false flag operations or exaggerated narratives aimed at bolstering domestic morale and political objectives. Same episode of blame game was seen in Pulwama incident, when Indian Army falsely blamed Pakistan for conducting attack within Indian territory.
In conclusion, while the Indian Army’s blame game to conduct surgical strikes is notable, the associated claims and the broader security environment reveal critical inconsistencies. Addressing these concerns requires a nuanced understanding of operational challenges, strategic priorities, and resource allocation within the Indian Army. Transparent assessment and effective strategy are essential for overcoming persistent security challenges in Kashmir and maintaining a secure and stable border.
Leave a Reply