On November 15, 2024, the resignation of Inspector Sagapam Ibotombi Singh, the Officer-in-Charge (OC) of Jiribam Police Station in Manipur, is a stark signal of the growing disillusionment within the region’s security forces. A seasoned officer with nearly two decades of service, Singh’s decision to step down, citing “unavoidable circumstances” and family reasons, comes at a time when the state is grappling with rising ethnic violence, political instability, and a series of government actions that have left many security personnel feeling unsupported.
Singh’s resignation is more than just a personal choice- it reflects a wider pattern of demoralization affecting the entire security establishment in Manipur, including the Assam Rifles. These forces, once deeply trusted by local communities for their role in safeguarding the region, have seen their morale erode following the government’s decision to relocate two battalions of the Assam Rifles from Manipur to Jammu and Kashmir. The move has sparked outrage, especially at a time when ethnic violence is escalating in the state. Local communities, who relied on the Assam Rifles’ long-standing relationships and understanding of local dynamics, now feel abandoned.
The redeployment of the Assam Rifles highlights a growing disconnect between the central government’s decisions and the ground realities in the Northeast. The replacement force, the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), lacks the local knowledge and cultural familiarity that the Assam Rifles had cultivated over decades. To make matters worse, allegations of human rights violations against the CRPF- particularly accusations of sexual violence against Kuki women- have only deepened the sense of mistrust and resentment. This loss of confidence in security forces is contributing to a broader disengagement among officers, including Singh, who are increasingly disillusioned with the government’s handling of the region’s security challenges.
This trend of demoralization could have significant political repercussions, especially for Chief Minister N. Biren Singh and the BJP-led state government. The BJP has long positioned itself as the party of strong governance and national security, but the growing unrest within the security forces could undermine this stance. If more officers follow Singh’s example and resign, or if they disengage from active duty, the state’s ability to maintain law and order will be severely compromised. This could put the government in a difficult position, potentially forcing it to impose presidential rule in an attempt to restore control. However, such a move would likely escalate tensions, further alienating local populations and heightening fears of authoritarian governance.
Additionally, the suspension of operations agreements between the government and insurgent groups could be at risk in this environment of instability and hostility. If tensions continue to rise, insurgent groups may perceive the government’s actions as hostile, leading an end in ceasefires and a return to full-scale violence. This could further destabilize Manipur making it harder for the government to negotiate peace with local groups.
One of the most immediate and serious concerns is the impact on border security, particularly along the India-Myanmar border. The Assam Rifles have historically been the first line of defense in this sensitive region, but their absence could leave a significant gap in security. If insurgent groups or ethnic militias from Myanmar were to launch an attack on a police station or other important installations in Manipur, it could quickly escalate into a larger crisis. Such an attack could reignite local ethnic tensions and raise concerns about cross-border insurgency. The porous nature of the India-Myanmar border makes it especially vulnerable to such threats, and without the Assam Rifles’ expertise, India’s ability to control infiltration and manage cross-border violence could be severely compromised.
The ongoing crisis in Manipur is not just about localized security issues- it reflects deeper challenges within India’s approach to conflict zones. The growing disengagement of security forces, coupled with rising tensions in the state, risks further destabilizing the region and stretching India’s security resources thin. If this unrest continues to fester without a change in strategy, it could undermine both the security and governance of Manipur, and potentially ripple outwards, affecting the broader Northeast. As the situation unfolds, the Indian government faces a critical decision: can it recalibrate its approach to the region and restore the trust of its security forces, or will the situation continue to deteriorate, leading to a wider crisis? The next few months will be crucial in determining whether Manipur’s instability can be contained or whether it will spiral into further chaos, testing the resilience of both the state and the nation.
Leave a Reply